What Is MQL (Minimum Quantity Lubrication) and How Can it Reduce
Total Lubricant Costs?

The process of selectively removing metal from a blank part -- subtractive manufacturing -- has a long and venerable tradition in the manufacturing sector. So, too, do the metalworking fluids (MWFs) used to lubricate and cool a workpiece as it is machined.

In recent times, manufacturing has put more focus on environmental sustainability. This, along with intense cost competition, has nudged machine shops away from the traditional concept of flooding a workpiece with MWF and toward a technology called MQL (Minimum Quantity Lubrication).

MWF vs. MQL
MQL is the precise application of small, measured amounts of lubricant to the tool/workpiece interface. Whereas the use of MWFs uses the sheer volume of the fluid to dissipate heat from the workpiece, MQL uses a high-grade lubricant to cool the workpiece not by dissipation, but by lubrication. In other words, the right lubricant, properly applied in the right amount, will coat the interface with a thin film of lubricant that reduces friction while cutting and prevents the excessive build-up of heat.

MQL Thermodynamics
The excellent surface adhesion of the lubricant provides superior lubricity and far less heat generation at the interface. In such a situation, most of the frictional heat generated is confined to the chip and removed as the chip flies off the workpiece. The result is the use of far less lubricant than traditional MWF, and the lubricated tool stays sharper for longer -- often, much longer. Further, MQL technology is a much cleaner process than MWF applications and not just because of the vast reduction in fluid volume used.

The working mechanism of MQL technology is such that the actual lubricant is almost completely consumed and vaporized in the process of cutting, leaving the part, the machine tool, and the area around it much cleaner and free of spilled coolant compared to when MWFs are used.

Most importantly, this improves the working environment and benefits the health of workers, who are no longer subjected to the toxicity, bacteria, and fungal exposure that may accompany MWF machining. It also reduces the cost of cleaning finished parts and/or metal chips (swarf) before they can be recycled.

MQL technology requires a dispensing mechanism for the lubricant, but it does not require the full re-circulating system required to recover, filter and re-apply MWFs to a machine tool. Additionally, MQL lubricants are generally based on esters or vegetable oils that are far less toxic to your workforce.

That's an excellent question, and we at Acculube invite you to call us for the answer, which varies with each machining application. We have seen it all, including the use of both MWFs and MQL technology on the same machine tool.

As with any emerging technology, the adoption of MQL has been slowed by industry misconceptions that, for example, equate the volume of fluid with efficient cooling of the workpiece. In such a case, it is hard for experienced machinists to trust the concept that a few droplets of lubricant can go such a long way. Whereas an MWF operation might use tens of gallons of fluid during a shift, MQL technology requires just a few ounces.

 

NEXT ESSAY

 

Talk with Us Today
If sustainability and cost control are on your mind, consider MQL technology, and call Acculube to learn what products are available, and how they perform in operations like yours.
Contact Us: 1.800.404.2570 or email us at sales@acculube.com



Think Twice Before Changing
a Proven Brand of Lubricant
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
How Do We Choose the Best Cutting Oil?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Monitoring and Controlling
Coolant Concentration
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Best Practices for Mixing
Water-Based Lubricants

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Metal Part Cleaning Basics
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Managing the Turnover
of Metalworking Fluids
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Particulates in Cutting Fluid -- A Fine Mess
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chips Off the Old Block
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reduce Foam: How to Prevent Foam in Oil
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Troubleshooting Tips for Machinists
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Coolant Smell: Lubricant Solutions
to Prevent Rancidity
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Irritant Contact Dermatitis: How to
Avoid This Common Shop Issue
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"Why Does This Sump Smell?"
Coolant Sump Odor; What to Do
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thoroughly Clean Those Coolant Systems!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maximize Fluid Performance
with Optimal Water Quality

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Grease Compatibility Matters
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prevent Metal Corrosion
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Viscosity Grade Comparisons
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acculube Compatibility Chart
For Commercial Greases
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hydraulic System Maintenance
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maintaining Gear Box Lubrication
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Why is a Breather Filter Important?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
How Can Oil Leak Dye Pinpoint Leaks
and Save Money?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
How Can Lubrication Best Practices
Reduce Your Environmental Footprint?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
What Is MQL (Minimum Quantity Lubrication)
and How Can it Reduce Total Lubricant Costs?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Can a Lubrication Audit Show Us How to
Use Fewer Lubricants, and Save Costs?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
How to use a Grease Gun
to Lubricate Plain Bearings?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Why is Oil Testing Important for New Oil?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
How to Choose an Electric
Motor Bearing Grease

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Choosing the Best Water Solution for Your Machine Shop: Is it Reverse Osmosis? Deionized Water?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lubricant Contamination Control Helps Prevent Varnish Formation in Machine Shops
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selecting Diesel Engine Oil for Mixed Fleets
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
“More Than List Price” How Evaluating Synthetic vs. Conventional Oil Can Add – or Subtract – From Your Bottom Line
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodbye, Tramp Oil
Tramp Oil Contamination Is Not Inevitable

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Don't Waylay Your Machine Tools with the Wrong Way Oil
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vibratory Finishing Basics
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Changing Attitude Toward
Basic Maintenance